The International Masonry Institute (IMI) is a labor-management partnership between the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers (BAC) and its signatory contractors that works to promote responsible building with masonry and tile. IMI’s team of architects, engineers, and construction managers researches and develops programs and technical advice related to masonry and tile installation, including around the resilience, sustainability, and durability of these materials and their building systems. IMI is actively involved and has been for decades, in national and local code committees, and we understand how critical it is to avoid disastrous unintended consequences with code changes. Thus, we write in strong support of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) and Metropolitan Fire Chiefs Association (Metro Chiefs) Joint Statement Regarding single stairways in multi-family buildings.
Effective fire safety involves a multi-pronged approach or balanced design. Balanced design relies on three components: a fire detection system, a containment system (walls and floors), and an automatic suppression system. This type of design doesn’t rely on a single element but works together to save lives and protect property. Single point access requires everything to go right in an emergency, which rarely happens.
In addition to retaining the current stair shaft requirements, the code should prioritize non-combustible construction (Types I, II and III) for all heights in multi-family structures (similar to European construction). The use of non-combustible construction not only protects the lives of the occupants and first responders, but also provides property protection. Shaft walls should meet at least a 2-hr fire rating to increase the resiliency and protection of a structure. The resiliency of buildings must be higher due to increased risks from wildfires, flooding and high winds. Bouncing back from these types of hazards requires a higher level of protection than that afforded by the minimum requirements of the building code. In addition, the service life of noncombustible materials is much greater than that of wood and gypsum extending the time between repair and replacement lessening the associated environmental impacts.
This discussion on changing the building code should be about how we can improve the safety and security of all of our buildings for the benefit of those individuals who live and work inside, not make changes that allow developers to maximize profit without regard to the risks facing residents who expect a safe dwelling, or of first responders who need quick and secure access to an emergency.